Shivani Bhandari, Kasper E. Heintz, Kshitij Aggarwal, Lachlan Marnoch, Cherie K. Day, Jessica Sydnor, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Casey J. Law, J. Xavier Prochaska, Nicolas Tejos, Keith W. Bannister, Bryan J. Butler, Adam T.Deller, R. D. Ekers, Chris Flynn, Wen-fai Fong, Clancy W. James, T. Joseph W. Lazio, Rui Luo, Elizabeth K. Mahony, Stuart D. Ryder, Elaine M. Sadler, Ryan M. Shannon, JinLin Han, Kejia Lee, Bing Zhang: Characterizing the FRB host galaxy population and its connection to transients in the local and extragalactic Universe; The Astronomical Journal, vol. 163, issue 2, id. 69; January 2022
We present the localization and host galaxies of one repeating and two apparently non-repeating Fast Radio Bursts. FRB20180301A was detected and localized with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array to a star-forming galaxy at z=0.3304. FRB20191228A, and FRB20200906A were detected and localized by the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder to host galaxies at z=0.2430 and z=0.3688, respectively. We combine these with 13 other well-localised FRBs in the literature, and analyse the host galaxy properties. We find no significant differences in the host properties of repeating and apparently non-repeating FRBs. FRB hosts are moderately star-forming, with masses slightly offset from the star-forming main-sequence. Star formation and low-ionization nuclear emission-line region (LINER) emission are major sources of ionization in FRB host galaxies, with the former dominant in repeating FRB hosts. FRB hosts do not track stellar mass and star formation as seen in field galaxies (95% confidence). FRBs are rare in massive red galaxies, suggesting that progenitor formation channels are not solely dominated by delayed channels which lag star formation by gigayears. The global properties of FRB hosts are indistinguishable from core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) and short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) hosts (95% confidence), and the spatial offset (from galaxy centers) of FRBs is consistent with that of the Galactic neutron star population. The spatial offsets of FRBs (normalized to the galaxy effective radius) mostly differs from that of globular clusters (GCs) in late- and early-type galaxies with 95% confidence.
2021
C. Nuñez, N. Tejos, G. Pignata, C. D. Kilpatrick, J. X. Prochaska, K. E. Heintz, K. W. Bannister, S. Bhandari, C. K. Day, A. T. Deller, C. Flynn, E. K. Mahony, D. Majewski, L. Marnoch, H. Qiu, S. D. Ryder, R. M. Shannon; Constraining bright optical counterparts of fast radio bursts, Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 653, A119; September 2021.
Context. Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are extremely energetic pulses of millisecond duration and unknown origin. To understand the phenomenon that emits these pulses, targeted and un-targeted searches have been performed for multiwavelength counterparts, including the optical.
Aims. The objective of this work is to search for optical transients at the positions of eight well-localized (< 1″) FRBs after the arrival of the burst on different timescales (typically at one day, several months, and one year after FRB detection). We then compare this with known optical light curves to constrain progenitor models.
Methods. We used the Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope (LCOGT) network to promptly take images with its network of 23 telescopes working around the world. We used a template subtraction technique to analyze all the images collected at differing epochs. We have divided the difference images into two groups: In one group we use the image of the last epoch as a template, and in the other group we use the image of the first epoch as a template. We then searched for optical transients at the localizations of the FRBs in the template subtracted images.
Results. We have found no optical transients and have therefore set limiting magnitudes to the optical counterparts. Typical limits in apparent and absolute magnitudes for our LCOGT data are ∼22 and −19 mag in the r band, respectively. We have compared our limiting magnitudes with light curves of super-luminous supernovae (SLSNe), Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia), supernovae associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRB-SNe), a kilonova, and tidal disruption events (TDEs).
Conclusions. Assuming that the FRB emission coincides with the time of explosion of these transients, we rule out associations with SLSNe (at the ∼99.9% confidence level) and the brightest subtypes of SNe Ia, GRB-SNe, and TDEs (at a similar confidence level). However, we cannot exclude scenarios where FRBs are directly associated with the faintest of these subtypes or with kilonovae.
Jay S. Chittidi, Sunil Simha, Alexandra Mannings, J. Xavier Prochaska, Mark Rafelski, Marcel Neeleman, Jean-Pierre Macquart, Nicolas Tejos, Regina A. Jorgenson, Stuart D. Ryder, Cherie K. Day, Lachlan Marnoch, Shivani Bhandari, Adam T. Deller, Hao Qiu, Keith W. Bannister, Ryan M. Shannon, Kasper E. Heintz; Dissecting the Local Environment of FRB 190608 in the Spiral Arm of its Host Galaxy, The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 922, issue 2, id. 173; November 2021.